Searce v. Owens
William H. Searce |
Warden Owens and Angela Owens |
2:2019cv02094 |
February 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Mark S Norris |
Tu M Pham |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Angela Owens. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Attachment, #3 Attachment, #4 Attachment, #5 Attachment, #6 Attachment)(Canale, Stuart) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of returned certified receipt #9590 9402 3890 8060 2390 06. (jld) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of returned certified receipt # 9590 9402 3890 8060 2390 37 sent to Angela Owens (jld) |
Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO RESPONDTO PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 2/25/2019. (Norris, Mark) |
Filing 4 Case initiation fee: PAID $ 5.00, receipt number M4676041132 (csf) |
Filing 3 ORDER. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 2/8/19. (Norris, Mark) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
Filing 1 PRO SE Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 filed by William H. Searce against Owens. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Certified Mail Receipts, #3 Envelope (Front and Back), #4 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.