Borum v. T.D.O.C. (Tennessee Department of Corrections) et al
Martin Borum |
T.D.O.C. (Tennessee Department of Corrections), Sgt Ed Currin and Medical Department of N.W.C.X |
2:2019cv02156 |
March 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Sheryl H Lipman |
Thomas L Parker |
Diane K Vescovo |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 3/12/19. (Lipman, Sheryl) |
Judge Sheryl H. Lipman added. Judge Thomas L. Parker no longer assigned to case. Judge Parker was selected in error. (jae) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
Filing 3 PRO SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Martin Borum. (jae) |
Filing 2 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Martin Borum. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Transactions)(jae) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Ed Currin, Medical Department of N.W.C.X, T.D.O.C. (Tennessee Department of Corrections), filed by Martin Borum. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Affidavit, #2 Judicial assignment cards)(jae) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/6/2019: #3 Envelope) (jae). (Attachment 2 replaced on 3/11/2019) (jae). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.