Lee v. Bailey et al
| Anderson Lee |
| (F/N/U) Smith, James Bailey and (f/n/u) Presson |
| 2:2019cv02161 |
| March 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Mark S Norris |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of Tennessee Middle; Case Number 3:18-cv-01324. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 8
ORDER: The application to proceed in forma pauperis #7 is GRANTED. Anderson Lee is ASSESSED the $350.00 filing fee. In the interest of justice, the Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court of the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division at Memphis. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/7/19. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. Custodian of Inmate Trust Fund Account at TTCC by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 3/8/2019.]
|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Anderson Lee. (dt) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 3/8/2019.] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Deadline (Doc. No. #5 ), requesting another 30 days to comply with the Court's previous Order. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. No. #5 ) is GRANTED. Within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket, Plaintiff MUST either pay the full $400.00 filing fee, or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/23/19. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 3/8/2019.]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Deadlines by Anderson Lee. (dt) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 3/8/2019.] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: If Plaintiff seeks to have this Court consider his complaint, he MUST either pay the full $400.00 filing fee, or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's submissions must be received in this Court within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 12/7/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail including IFP application.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 3/8/2019.]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 3/8/2019.] |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet and blank, pro se forms included).(dt) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 3/8/2019.] |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Anderson Lee. (dt) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 3/8/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Bailey, (f/n/u) Presson, (f/n/u) Smith, filed by Anderson Lee.(dt) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 3/8/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
