George v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
| Steve George |
| Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company |
| 2:2019cv02296 |
| May 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Tu M Pham |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on 7/2/2019. (Pham, Tu)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Proposed Order Submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3104747) by Steve George. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Cert.of Good Standing - Western Distr. of OK, #2 Exhibit Cert. of Good Standing - OK Supreme Court)(France, Tanner) |
| Filing 14 ATTACHMENT OK Supreme Court Cert. of Good Standing to #12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Proposed Order Submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number BTNWDC-3093324) by Steve George.. (Glass, Woodrow) |
| Filing 13 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Proposed Order Submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number BTNWDC-3093324) filed by Steve George has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Local Rule 83.4 states a requirement of two certificates of good standing. A certificate from the bar association will not substitute for a certificate from the Supreme Court. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (jae) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Proposed Order Submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number BTNWDC-3093324) by Steve George. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Glass, Woodrow) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company.(Chapski, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick Schaffler Quinn on behalf of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Quinn, Patrick) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. (Chapski, Robert) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert F. Chapski on behalf of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Chapski, Robert) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steve George as to Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. (Cannon, William) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jld) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld) |
| Filing 2 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jld) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-3061567), filed by Steve George. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Cannon, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: George v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | |
| Represented By: | Robert F. Chapski |
| Represented By: | Patrick Schaffler Quinn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steve George | |
| Represented By: | William Joshua Cannon |
| Represented By: | Woodrow K Glass |
| Represented By: | Tanner France |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
