Madkins v. Slatery et al
| Richard Earl Madkins |
| Tony Parker, Douglas Stephens, Damon Hininger, Corrections Corporation of America, Christopher Brunch, Candace Whisman, Herbert H. Slatery, III, Russell Washburn, John Ferguson and Rusty Washburn |
| 2:2019cv02352 |
| June 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| John T Fowlkes |
| Diane K Vescovo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus TO TRANSFER SUCCESSIVE HABEAS PETITION - PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED by Rusty Washburn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memorandum in Support of Respondent's Motion to Transfer Successive Habeas Petition)(Stahl, Michael) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 insofar as it seeks an order directing the Warden to respond and otherwise denying relief. The Warden's response is due on July 29, 2019. Signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 07/01/2019. (Fowlkes, J.)
|
| Filing 8 Pro Se Emergency MOTION For An Order Forthwith Granting Writ Of Habeas Corpus Relief Or Issue An Order Directing The Respondent To Show Cause Why The Writ Should Not Be Granted Under 2243 And Memorandum Of Law by Richard Earl Madkins. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Richard Earl Madkins, Jr., #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Supplement, #5 Notice To The Clerk, #6 Envelope)(jld) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Tennessee Middle; Case Number 3:19-cv-00433. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/3/2019: #2 judicial assignment card) (jae). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Because Petitioner's in forma pauperis application reflects that he does not have sufficient resources to pay the filing fee, the application (Doc. No. 2) is GRANTED. And for the following reasons, the Petition will be transferred to the Western District of Tennessee. For these reasons, the Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division at Memphis. 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). Petitioner is notified all future submissions in this case MUST be directed to the Western District of Tennessee. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 5/31/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 6/3/2019.]
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Matthew Stahl on behalf of Herbert H. Slatery, III (Stahl, Michael) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 6/3/2019.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 6/3/2019.] |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 6/3/2019.] |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Richard Earl Madkins. (afs) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 6/3/2019.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Richard Earl Madkins.(afs) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 6/3/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
