Gbor v. Owens
| Jeffery Dulwonh Gbor |
| Warden Owens and Warden Angela Owens |
| 2:2019cv02413 |
| June 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Diane K Vescovo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER TO MODIFY THE DOCKET AND DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO RESPOND TO PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 8/2/19. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 5 Letter from Jeffery D. Gbor requesting information that fee paid. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (jae) |
| Filing 4 Case initiation fee: PAID $ 5.00, receipt number M4676042761 (csf) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT AND TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR PAY THE $5.00 HABEAS CORPUS FILING FEE. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 6/26/19. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 filed by Jeffery Dulwonh Gbor against Owens. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Support, #2 Attachments, #3 Envelope (Front and Back), #4 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
