Porreca v. State of Tennessee
| Edward Porreca |
| State of Tennessee |
| 2:2019cv02486 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Mark S Norris |
| Tu M Pham |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss UNTIMELY PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by State of Tennessee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memorandum of Law and Facts in Support of Motion to Dismiss Untimely Habeas Corpus Petition)(Stahl, Michael) |
| Filing 8 INDEX OF STATE COURT RECORD by State of Tennessee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Technical record of post-conviction proceedings, post-conviction appellate record Vol. I, Shelby County Criminal Court no. 12-01529, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Petitioners post-conviction proceedings, post-conviction appellate record Vol. 2, Shelby County Criminal Court no. 12-01529., #3 Exhibit Transcript of guilty plea, post-conviction appellate record Vol. 3, Shelby County Criminal Court no. 12-01529., #4 Exhibit Transcript of post-conviction proceedings, post-conviction appellate record Vol. 4, Shelby County Criminal Court no. 12-01529., #5 Exhibit Petitioners notice of appeal from denial of post-conviction petition, Shelby County Criminal Court no. 12-01529., #6 Exhibit Brief of Appellant, Edward Porreca, on post-conviction review: Edward Porreca v. State of Tennessee, No. W2013-02443-CCA-R3-PC, 2015 WL 128037 (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 8, 2015); perm. app. denied (Tenn. May 18, 2015)., #7 Exhibit Brief of Appellee, State of Tennessee, on post-conviction review: Edward Porreca v. State of Tennessee, No. W2013-02443-CCA-R3-PC, 2015 WL 128037 (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 8, 2015); perm. app. denied (Tenn. May 18, 2015)., #8 Exhibit Opinion of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals: Edward Porreca v. State of Tennessee, No. W2013-02443-CCA-R3-PC, 2015 WL 128037 (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 8, 2015); perm. app. denied (Tenn. May 18, 2015)., #9 Exhibit Judgment of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals: Edward Porreca v. State of Tennessee, No. W2013-02443-CCA-R3-PC, 2015 WL 128037 (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 8, 2015); perm. app. denied (Tenn. May 18, 2015)., #10 Exhibit Petitioners R.11 application for discretionary review: Edward Porreca v. State of Tennessee, No. W2013-02443-SC-R11-CD (Tenn. May 18, 2015)., #11 Exhibit Order from the Tennessee Supreme Court denying discretionary review: Edward Porreca v. State of Tennessee, No. W2013-02443-SC-R11-CD (Tenn. May 18, 2015)., #12 Exhibit Petitioners motion to reopen his post-conviction proceedings, filed July 24, 2018, Shelby County Criminal Court no. 12-01529., #13 Exhibit Post-conviction court order denying Petitioners motion to reopen, filed August 2, 2018, Shelby County Criminal Court no. 12-01529., #14 Exhibit Petitioners R.28 application to appeal the denial of his motion to reopen, filed September 1, 2018, Shelby County Criminal Court no. 12-01529., #15 Exhibit States answer to Petitioners R.28 application, filed September 27, 2018, Shelby County Criminal Court no. 12-01529., #16 Exhibit Order denying R.28 application: Porrecea v. State, No. W2018-01593-CCA-R28-PC (Tenn. Crim. App. Nov. 15, 2018); perm. app. denied (Tenn. Feb. 25, 2019)., #17 Exhibit Order from the Tennessee Supreme Court denying discretionary review: Porreca v. State, No. W2018-01593-SC-R11-CD (Tenn. Feb. 25, 2019).)(Stahl, Michael) |
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE RECORD AND RESPOND TO THE PETITION. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 8/28/2019. (Norris, Mark)
|
| Filing 6 Case initiation fee: PAID $ 5.00, receipt number M4676043095 (csf) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Matthew Stahl on behalf of State of Tennessee (Stahl, Michael) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING #2 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO PAY THE HABEAS FILING FEE. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 8/2/19. (Norris, Mark)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Porreca. (csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Edward Porreca against State of Tennessee. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Envelope (Left and Right Side), #3 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Porreca v. State of Tennessee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Edward Porreca | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Tennessee | |
| Represented By: | Michael Matthew Stahl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
