Hite v. State of Tennessee
Defendant: State of Tennessee
Petitioner: Marterrius Montrell Hite
Respondent: Shelby County Sherriff Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2019cv02508
Filed: August 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Mark S Norris
Referring Judge: Tu M Pham
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2019 Filing 11 Pro Se AFFIDAVIT of Declaration by Marterrius Montrell Hite. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jld)
September 30, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of returned certified receipt #9590 9402 3890 8060 2388 70 (jld)
September 26, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of returned certified receipt #9590 9402 3890 8060 2388 87 (jld)
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO MODIFY DOCKET, DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE RECORD AND RESPOND TO THE PETITION. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 9/23/19. (Norris, Mark)
September 23, 2019 NOTICE Order and Petition sent certified mail to the Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter #9590 9402 3890 8060 2388 70 and to the Shelby County Sheriff Floyd Bonner, Jr. #9590 9402 3890 8060 2388 87. (jld)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #5 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 9/19/19. (Norris, Mark)
September 9, 2019 Filing 6 Pro Se MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Marterrius Montrell Hite. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jld)
September 6, 2019 Filing 5 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marterrius Montrell Hite. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund, #2 Envelope)(jld)
August 12, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Davison Douglas on behalf of State of Tennessee (Douglas, Richard)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT AND TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR PAY THE $5.00 HABEAS CORPUS FILING FEE. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 8/12/19. (Norris, Mark)
August 6, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf)
August 6, 2019 Filing 1 PRO SE Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Marterrius Montrell Hite against State of Tennessee. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope (Left and Right of Front), #3 Judicial Cards)(csf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hite v. State of Tennessee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Tennessee
Represented By: Richard Davison Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marterrius Montrell Hite
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Shelby County Sherriff Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?