United States of America v. Crown Manufacturing, Inc., et al
| United States of America |
| Sheri M. Brunson |
| Crown Manufacturing, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02638 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Diane K Vescovo |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER OF GARNISHMENT, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 10/31/2019. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Writ of Garnishment. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jld) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by United States of America re #5 Writ of Garnishment Proof of Service upon Defendant (Canale, Stuart) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stuart J. Canale on behalf of United States of America (Canale, Stuart) |
| Filing 5 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued (jld) |
| Filing 4 *******No ADR Plan for Garnishments**** (jld). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Administrative track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 2 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo added. (jld) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment (PLEASE ISSUE), filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zoccola, Barbara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
