Lassiter v. State of Tennessee et al
| Richard Lassiter, Richard A. Lassiter and Richard Alan Lassiter |
| E. Kelly, F. Frias, Marion A. Wright, State of Tennessee and Yolanda Jones |
| 2:2019cv02716 |
| October 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| James D Todd |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CIVIL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 10/28/2019. (ejc) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO MODIFY THE DOCKET, DENYING #2 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), CERTIFYING AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND DENYING LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 10/25/19. (cdi)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard Lassiter. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Balance History Report)(csf) |
| Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-01 case reassigned to Judge James D. Todd. Judge Mark S. Norris no longer assigned to case. (csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
