Zapata v. State of Tennessee et al
| Guillermo Zapata |
| Amy Weirich and State of Tennessee |
| 2:2019cv02800 |
| November 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| John T Fowlkes |
| Diane K Vescovo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting DE #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 1/16/20. (Fowlkes, J.)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of filing Inmate Balance History Report by Guillermo Zapata (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to comply with 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) or pay the $400 filing fee signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 11/21/19. (Fowlkes, J.)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Guillermo Zapata. (csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 filed by Guillermo Zapata against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Statement of 11/13/2019, #2 Letter of 12/18/2018, #3 CCA Motion to Dismiss, #4 Envelope, #5 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
