Jackson v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
| Stevie D Jackson |
| The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Freddie Mac, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and Belgravia Square |
| Clerk and Master W. Aaron Hall |
| 2:2020cv02011 |
| January 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| John T Fowlkes |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Diane K Vescovo |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Belgravia Square answer due 2/23/2020. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 01/22/2020. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 12 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr added. Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr no longer assigned to case. (jld) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE from Judge Fowlkes to Judge Mays. Signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 01/22/2020. (Fowlkes, John)
|
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Belgravia Square. (Tansey, Nicholas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas J. Tansey on behalf of Belgravia Square (Tansey, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 1/15/20. (Fowlkes, J.)
|
| Filing 7 **********Please disregard************** Modified on 1/15/2020 (jld). |
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, (Proposed Order Submitted) by Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. (McFall, Erin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Chancery Court, Shelby County, case number CH-19-1617-III (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-3252418), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(McFall, Erin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
