Stokes v. Rogers
Dearick Stokes |
Sammy Rogers |
2:2020cv02338 |
May 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATNWDC-3343624), filed by Dearick Stokes. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Law in Support, #2 Exhibit Order Denying PPCR, #3 Exhibit Appellate Opinion, #4 Exhibit Appellate Opinion)(Ferguson, Claiborne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stokes v. Rogers | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Dearick Stokes | |
Represented By: | Claiborne Hambrick Ferguson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Sammy Rogers | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.