Gus's Franchisor, LLC v. Terrapin Restaurant Partners, LLC et al
| Gus's Franchisor, LLC |
| Terrapin Restaurant Partners, LLC and Mark Dawejko |
| 2:2020cv02372 |
| May 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Jon Phipps McCalla |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Mark Dawejko. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Terrapin Restaurant Partners, LLC. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jld) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 2 Judge Jon Phipps McCalla and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (jld) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Dawejko, Terrapin Restaurant Partners, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CTNWDC-3353672), filed by Gus's Franchisor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Terrapin Restaurant Partners, LLC, #3 Summons Mark Dawejko, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Terrapin Termination, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 2 Rifkin to Marshall, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 3 FDD stacked w Exhibits, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 4 Franchise Agreement, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 5 Terrapin Restaurant Partners LLC Guaranty, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 6 Terrapin's Acknowledgment of Receipt, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 7 Terrapin's Franchise Closing Questionnaire, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 8 Ltr to Mark Dawejko re Notice, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 9 Ltr to Mark Dawejko re Notice, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 10 Ltr to Mark Dawejko re Franchise Agreement)(Marshall, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
