Brusseau v. Shelby County Healthcare Corporation, d/b/a Regional One Health
| Edward Brusseau |
| Shelby County Healthcare Corporation, d/b/a Regional One Health |
| Clerk Temiika Gipson |
| 2:2020cv02492 |
| July 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SETTING LETTER: A TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference is set for 9/22/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Samuel H. Mays Jr. (der) (Main Document 10 replaced on 8/18/2020) (der). |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Shelby County Healthcare Corporation, d/b/a Regional One Health.(Davis, Emma) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 07/15/2020. Defendant Shelby County Healthcare Corporation d/b/a Regional One Health's answer is due on 8/17/2020. (May, Samuel)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint, proposed order submitted by Shelby County Healthcare Corporation, d/b/a Regional One Health. (Davis, Emma) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jld) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 3 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (jld) (jld). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Emma Redden Davis on behalf of Shelby County Healthcare Corporation, d/b/a Regional One Health (Davis, Emma) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Shelby County Healthcare Corporation, d/b/a Regional One Health from Shelby County Circuit Court, case number CT-2338-20 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-3384586), filed by Shelby County Healthcare Corporation, d/b/a Regional One Health. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B- Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hancock, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
