Hill v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
| Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr. |
| Sgt. Harris, Ofc. Watlans, Ofc. Smith, Shelby County Correctional Center, Ofc. Thomas, Ofc. Woods, D.R.T. Richardson and D.R.T. Elliot |
| 2:2020cv02513 |
| July 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Memphis Office |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| James D Todd |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) OR PAY THE $400 CIVIL FILING FEE. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 7/16/2020. (mbm)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr. (csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Right Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 filed by Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr. against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Statement, #2 Inmate Grievance Forms, #3 Envelope, #4 Original Judicial Card, #5 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
| Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-01 case reassigned to Judge James D. Todd. Judge Mark S. Norris no longer assigned to case. (csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
