Hightower v. Shelby County Corrections Center et al
Jerome Michael Hightower |
Jerry Scott, Anthony C. Alexander, Michael House, Mayor Lee Harris and Shelby County Corrections Center |
2:2020cv02643 |
August 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Charmiane G Claxton |
James D Todd |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ASSESSING $350 FILING FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLRA. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 8/24/2020. (mbm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
Filing 2 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jerome Michael Hightower. (Attachments: #1 Trust fund statment)(jae) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Anthony C. Alexander, Lee Harris, Michael House, Jerry Scott, Shelby County Corrections Center, filed by Jerome Michael Hightower. (Attachments: #1 original Judicial card, #2 Reassigned Judicial cards, #3 envelope)(jae) |
Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-01 case reassigned to Judge James D. Todd. Judge Thomas L. Parker no longer assigned to case. (jae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.