Thompson v. Cardionet
| Suzanne Thompson |
| Cardionet, LLC doing business as Biotel Heart |
| Temiika Gipson |
| 2:2020cv02661 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE by Cardionet, LLC of Service of Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures by Defendant (Garmen, Kyler) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE by Suzanne Thompson Notice of Service of Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures by Plaintiff (May, Matthew) |
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 10/14/20. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE SETTING TRIAL WITH PRETRIAL PROCEDURES: Jury Trial set for Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. Trial is estimated to last 3-4 days. Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due by Thursday, December 30, 2021. Pretrial Conference set for Friday, January 7, 2022 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. (vup) |
| Filing 14 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman: Scheduling Conference held on 10/14/2020. Matthew Thomas May appeared for the Plaintiff(s). Kyler Garmen appeared for the Defendant(s). The court discussed the dates and deadlines with the parties. Jury Trial set for Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. Trial is estimated to last 3-4 days. Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due by Thursday, December 30, 2021. Pretrial Conference set for Friday, January 7, 2022 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. #10 Motion to Strike DENIED as moot. Scheduling Order to be entered. (Court Reporter: Catherine Phillips) (Tape #FTR.) (vup) |
| Filing 13 "PLEASE DISREGARD, MINUTES ENTERED IN WRONG CASE. Modified on 10/14/2020 (vup). |
| Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Garmen, Kyler) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 MOTION to Strike #9 Answer to Complaint affirmative defense, proposed order submitted filed by Cardionet, LLC. (Garmen, Kyler) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Strike #9 Answer to Complaint affirmative defense, proposed order submitted by Suzanne Thompson. (May, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 Amended ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Cardionet, LLC.(Garmen, Kyler) |
| Filing 8 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for Wednesday, October 14, 2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. The proceeding will be done via Skype for Business video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties shall consult the #Skype for Business webpage for instructions on downloading the proper extensions for their computer.Please email Sandra McClain at sandra_mcclain@tnwd.uscourts.gov for any questions. (smm) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 4 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (jae) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Cardionet, LLC d/b/a Biotel Heart.(Garmen, Kyler) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyler S Garmen on behalf of Cardionet, LLC d/b/a Biotel Heart (Garmen, Kyler) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cardionet, LLC d/b/a Biotel Heart from Shelby County Circuit Court, case number CT-3075-20 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-3425924), filed by Cardionet, LLC d/b/a Biotel Heart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Garmen, Kyler) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
