FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES v. United States of America
| FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES |
| United States of America |
| 2:2020cv02794 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. § 7422 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 United States' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 12/14/2020. The time within which the government shall file its response to Plaintiffs complaint shall be and hereby is extended through and including February 19, 2021. (Mays, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 19
Consent MOTION to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint. Proposed order submitted. by United States of America. (Johnson, Cory)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 12/9/2020. (Mays, Samuel) (Entered: 12/09/2020)
|
|
Filing 17
Consent MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed order submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3500949) by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Johnson, Cory)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Appearance by Peter David Blumberg on behalf of FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES (Blumberg, Peter)
|
|
Filing 15
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and related Exhibits and Appendix served on The Honorable William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States of America on November 16, 2020, filed by FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES. (Judkins, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 14
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and related Exhibits and Appendix served on The Honorable William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States of America on November 16, 2020, filed by FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES. (Judkins, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 13
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and related Exhibits and Appendix served on D. Michael Dunavant, United States Attorney's Office on November 3, 2020, filed by FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES. (Judkins, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Richard R. Roberts on behalf of FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES (Roberts, Richard)
|
|
Filing 11
DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #10 Notice of Appearance filed by FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: The date of signature and the case number are missing from the notice of appearance. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (jld)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Richard R. Roberts on behalf of FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES (Roberts, Richard)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jld)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jld)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to United States Attorney D. Michael Dunavant. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Attorney General William Barr. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld)
|
|
Filing 4
Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jld)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by George Millington Clarke, III on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Clarke, George)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Cameron Reilly on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Reilly, Cameron)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number BTNWDC-3474562), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Appendix, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Judkins, Joseph)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
