Sease v. United States of America
Petitioner: Arthur Sease, IV
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2020cv02873
Filed: November 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Jon Phipps McCalla
Referring Judge: Tu M Pham
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE by Arthur Sease, IV re #9 Answer to Complaint Reply to Government's Response (Gordon, Jeremy)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by United States of America.(Bedini, Naya)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 *TEXT ORDER* GRANTING #7 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S 2255 MOTION. The Government shall file its Answer by no later than Friday, January 29, 2021. Signed by Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 12/30/2020. (joj)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (proposed order submitted) by United States of America. (Bedini, Naya)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice*/ TEXT GRANT ONLY - NO PDF */. Signed by Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 12/18/2020. (pa)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Proposed Order Submitted) (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3508109) by Arthur Sease, IV. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Attachment A - List of Courts Admitted To, #2 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing)(Gordon, Jeremy)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Naya Bedini on behalf of United States of America (Bedini, Naya)
December 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING UNITED STATES TO RESPOND. Signed by Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 12/2/2020. (joj)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Order from COA Authorizing District Court to Consider Second or Successive Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence filed by Arthur Sease, IV against United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Letter from COA, #2 Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255, #3 Motion Seeking Permission to File Successive 28 U.S.C. 2255, #4 Judicial Cards)(csf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sease v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Naya Bedini
Represented By: 2255 AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Arthur Sease, IV
Represented By: Jeremy Brian Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?