Duventre v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
| Shirley Duventre |
| Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
| Temiika Gipson |
| 2:2020cv02905 |
| December 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Samuel H Mays |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
REPLY to Response to Motion re #13 Response to Motion filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Bingham, Derrick)
|
|
Filing 16
SETTING LETTER: Jury Trial set for Monday, 2/28/2022 at 9:30 AM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr.; Pretrial Conference set for Friday, 2/18/2022 at 9:30 AM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr.; Proposed Pretrial Order due by 2/11/2022. (jam)
|
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: The following ddls/scheds were established: join parties/amend pleadings ddls for the pltf 04/05/21 and 04/19/21 for the deft; ADR/Mediation ddl 09/03/21; complete discovery ddl 09/03/21; expert disclosure for pltf ddl 07/03/21 and 08/03/21 for deft; supplementation under rule 26(e) ddl 09/02/21; dispositive motions ddl 10/03/21; Jury Trial set Monday, 02/28/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (est. 1-2 days); Pretrial Conference set Friday, 02/18/2022 at 9:30 A.M.; Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due 02/11/2022. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 02/03/21. (Mays, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTES: TELEPHONE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 02/03/2021 before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr.; Atty Steven W. Pittman appeared for the pltf; Atty Derrick L. Bingham appeared for the deft. The following ddls/scheds were established: join parties/amend pleadings ddls for the pltf 04/05/21 and 04/19/21 for the deft; ADR/Mediation ddl 09/03/21; complete discovery ddl 09/03/21; expert disclosure for pltf ddl 07/03/21 and 08/03/21 for deft; supplementation under rule 26(e) ddl 09/02/21; dispositive motions ddl 10/03/21; Jury Trial set Monday, 02/28/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (est. 1-2 days); Pretrial Conference set Friday, 02/18/2022 at 9:30 A.M.; Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due 02/11/2022. (Court Reporter: Candace Covey) (jam)
|
|
Filing 13
RESPONSE to Motion re #2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Shirley Duventre. (Pittman, Steven)
|
|
Filing 12
SETTING LETTER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for Wednesday, 2/3/2021 at 2:15 PM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. (jam)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTES: TELEPHONE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 01/27/2021 before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr.; Steven W. Pittman appeared for the pltf; Derrick L. Bingham appeared for the deft. Counsel to re-submit proposed scheduling order with updated dates and deadlines. The Telephone Scheduling Conference is reset to Wednesday, 02/03/21 at 2:15 PM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. (Court Reporter: Candace Covey) (jam)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE by Shirley Duventre NOTICE OF SERVICE FOR PLAINTIFFS RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES (Pittman, Steven)
|
|
Filing 9
SETTING LETTER: A TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference is set for 1/27/2021 at 02:30 PM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr.(der) (Main Document 9 replaced on 12/18/2020) (der).
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae)
|
|
Filing 5
Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (jae)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet (Bingham, Derrick)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. identifying Corporate Parent The Home Depot, Inc. for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc... (Bingham, Derrick)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion, #2 Exhibit 1 - April 24, 2020 Covid Order, #3 Exhibit 2 - May 26, 2020 Covid Order)(Bingham, Derrick)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. from Circuit Court of Tennessee for Thirtieth Judicial District at Memphis, case number CT-4824-20-VIII (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3507149), filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Bingham, Derrick)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
