Hamilton v. Shelby County, Tennessee
Plaintiff: Timiko Hamilton
Defendant: Shelby County, Tennessee
Case Number: 2:2020cv02911
Filed: December 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Sheryl H Lipman
Referring Judge: Tu M Pham
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit A - Prior Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summary Judgment, #4 Exhibit C - Bankruptcy Docket, #5 Exhibit D - Bankruptcy Schedule, #6 Exhibit E - Application and Order)(Leibovich, Robert)
February 2, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE CANCELLING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: (TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY): The Scheduling Conference currently set for Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 2:15 PM via Microsoft Teams Video Conference before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman has been cancelled. The parties will receive notice of the next setting by a separate entry from the assigned Magistrate Judge. (smm)
February 2, 2021 Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (Lipman, Sheryl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/2/2021: #1 Judicial Card) (btg).
February 2, 2021 Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham no longer assigned to case. (jae)
January 5, 2021 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Timiko Hamilton. Shelby County, Tennessee waiver sent on 12/28/2020, answer due 2/26/2021. (Allen, James)
January 5, 2021 Filing 8 SETTING LETTER: A Scheduling Conference has been set for Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 2:15 PM via Microsoft Teams Video Conference before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. The proceeding will be done via Microsoft Teams video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. Please email Sandra McClain at sandra_mcclain@tnwd.uscourts.gov for any questions. (smm)
January 5, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Frazier on behalf of Shelby County, Tennessee (Frazier, Katherine)
January 5, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Joseph Leibovich on behalf of Shelby County, Tennessee (Leibovich, Robert)
December 18, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae)
December 18, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae)
December 18, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae)
December 18, 2020 Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae)
December 18, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shelby County, Tennessee (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3508632), filed by Timiko Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint - Charge, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Complaint - Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Allen, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamilton v. Shelby County, Tennessee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shelby County, Tennessee
Represented By: Katherine L. Frazier
Represented By: Robert Joseph Leibovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timiko Hamilton
Represented By: James M. Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?