Reid v. Hailey
| Ian Reid |
| Stephanie Rason Hailey |
| Temiika Gipson |
| 2:2021cv02002 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Subpoena to Produce Documents served on COR Crumpler Exxon on 02/24/2021, filed by Stephanie Rason Hailey. (Slager, Jennifer) |
| Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Subpoena to Produce Documents served on COR Pump N Munch on 02/24/2021, filed by Stephanie Rason Hailey. (Slager, Jennifer) |
| Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Subpoena to Produce Documents served on Shell All in One on 02/24/2021, filed by Stephanie Rason Hailey. (Slager, Jennifer) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Ian Reid Plaintiff's Initial Disclosure Statement (Johnson, Margaret) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE by Stephanie Rason Hailey Notice of Service of Discovery (Slager, Jennifer) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Ian Reid Pltfs Notice of Filing Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures (Johnson, Margaret) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Stephanie Rason Hailey service of Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures (Slager, Jennifer) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 2/9/21. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE SETTING TRIAL WITH PRETRIAL PROCEDURES: Jury Trial set for Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. Trial is estimated to last 2 days. Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due by Monday, January 3, 2022. Pretrial Conference set for Monday, January 10, 2022 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. (smm) |
| Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman: Scheduling Conference was held via Microsoft Teams Video Conferencing on 02/09/2021. Margaret Johnson appeared for the plaintiff(s). Jennifer S. Slager appeared for the defendant(s). The court discussed the dates and deadlines with the parties. Jury Trial set for Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. Trial is estimated to last 2 days. Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due by Monday, January 3, 2022. Pretrial Conference set for Monday, January 10, 2022 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. Scheduling Order to be entered. (Court Reporter: Candace Covey) (smm) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Slager, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Stephanie Rason Hailey.(Slager, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 SETTING LETTER: A Scheduling Conference has been set for Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 1:30 PM via Microsoft Teams Video Conference before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. The proceeding will be done via Microsoft Teams video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. Please email Sandra McClain at sandra_mcclain@tnwd.uscourts.gov for any questions. (smm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (btg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (btg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Stephanie Rason Hailey from Shelby County Circuit Court, case number CT-5046-20 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3515365), filed by Stephanie Rason Hailey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Slager, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
