H. Saga International Inc. v. Medical Finance, LLC et al
| H. Saga International Inc. |
| Medical Financial Solutions, LLC, Medical Finance, LLC and Republic |
| Clerk W. Aaron Hall |
| 2:2021cv02085 |
| February 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G)(Smith, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by H. Saga International Inc.. (Varela, Pablo)
|
|
Filing 9
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Medical Finance, LLC, Medical Financial Solutions, LLC, Republic, filed by H. Saga International Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit) (Varela, Pablo)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob Ronald Swatley on behalf of H. Saga International Inc. (Swatley, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit Ex A, #3 Exhibit Ex B, #4 Exhibit Ex C, #5 Exhibit Ex D, #6 Exhibit Ex E, #7 Exhibit Ex F, #8 Exhibit Ex G)(Smith, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Quynh-Anh Dang Kibler on behalf of Medical Finance, LLC, Medical Financial Solutions, LLC (Kibler, Quynh-Anh)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae)
|
|
Filing 2
Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (jae)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Shelby Chancery, case number CH-20-1582-1 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BTNWDC-3540944), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Smith, Jeffrey)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
