Evolve Bank & Trust v. AT&T Corporation
Evolve Bank & Trust |
AT&T Corporation |
2:2021cv02096 |
February 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Annie T Christoff |
Mark S Norris |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 1/3/2022. (Norris, Mark) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by AT&T Corporation. (Wellford, Buckner) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Settlement by AT&T Corporation (Wellford, Buckner) |
Filing 20 First MEDIATION CERTIFICATION (Holder, Janice) |
Filing 19 SETTING LETTER: Jury Trial set for Monday, 06/20/2022 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4 - Memphis before Judge Mark S. Norris. Pretrial Conference set for Friday, 06/10/2022 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4 - Memphis before Judge Mark S. Norris. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 06/03/2022. (zsf) |
Filing 18 SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 6/24/2021. (Norris, Mark) |
Filing 17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Van Horn, Daniel) |
Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #15 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by AT&T Corporation. (Wellford, Buckner) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Evolve Bank & Trust. (Van Horn, Daniel) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Svilar on behalf of Evolve Bank & Trust (Svilar, Jennifer) |
Filing 13 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for Friday, 06/25/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4 - Memphis before Judge Mark S. Norris. (zsf) |
Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by AT&T Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Wellford, Buckner) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 03/05/2021. (Norris, Mark) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Evolve Bank & Trust as to AT&T Corporation. (Van Horn, Daniel) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum in Support - Unopposed [Proposed Order Submitted] by AT&T Corporation. (Berkowitz, Nicole) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Buckner Wellford on behalf of AT&T Corporation (Wellford, Buckner) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole D. Berkowitz on behalf of AT&T Corporation (Berkowitz, Nicole) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to AT&T Corporation. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
Filing 2 Judge Mark S. Norris and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (agj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T Corporation (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3544608), filed by Evolve Bank & Trust. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Van Horn, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Evolve Bank & Trust v. AT&T Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Evolve Bank & Trust | |
Represented By: | Daniel Warren Van Horn |
Represented By: | Jennifer Svilar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: AT&T Corporation | |
Represented By: | Buckner Wellford |
Represented By: | Nicole D. Berkowitz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.