Ballentine Express Corp. v. EAN Holdings, LLC et al
| Ballentine Express Corp. |
| Steven D. Barksdale and EAN Holdings, LLC doing business as Enterprise Rentals |
| 2:2021cv02242 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
MEMORANDUM in Support re #17 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted filed by EAN Holdings, LLC. (Adkins, Terrill)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted by EAN Holdings, LLC. (Adkins, Terrill)
|
|
Filing 16
ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand by EAN Holdings, LLC.(Adkins, Terrill)
|
|
Filing 15
[**TEXT ORDER ONLY--NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED**] Plaintiff Ballentine Express Corp. and Defendant EAN Holdings, LLC jointly move to extend Defendant EAN Holdings, LLC's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. (ECF No. #14 .) For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the motion. Defendant has until June 3, 2021, to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 5/11/2021. (ljt)
|
|
Filing 14
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by EAN Holdings, LLC. (Adkins, Terrill)
|
|
Filing 13
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on EAN Holdings, LLC on 04/22/2021, filed by Ballentine Express Corp.. (Thurman, Carson)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Terrill L. Adkins on behalf of EAN Holdings, LLC (Adkins, Terrill)
|
|
Filing 11
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ballentine Express Corp.. (Thurman, Carson)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons Issued as to Steven D. Barksdale. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj)
|
|
Filing 9
Summons Issued as to EAN Holdings, LLC. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Summons by Carson Holt Thurman on behalf of Ballentine Express Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Summons 2 - Summons - Barksdale)(Thurman, Carson)
|
|
Filing 7
DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Complaint,, filed by Ballentine Express Corp. has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Summonses to be issued are missing the Plaintiff's return information and address. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (btg)
|
|
Filing 6
COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Complaint,, filed by Ballentine Express Corp. has been filed. For future reference, please note: Civil cover sheet has 'wet' signature of attorney; all signatures must be electronic. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. Filer is not required to resubmit document. (btg)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (btg)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (btg)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg)
|
|
Filing 2
Judge Thomas L. Parker and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (btg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Steven D. Barksdale, EAN Holdings, LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3589759), filed by Ballentine Express Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Master Truck Rental Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Jan. 5, 2018 Rental Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Barksdale Complaint, #4 Exhibit 4 - Enterprise Subpoena, #5 Exhibit 5 - June 2, 2020 Enterprise Letter, #6 Exhibit 6 - Enterprise Email String_Redacted, #7 Exhibit 7 - Enterpise Declarations Page, #8 Summons 8 - Summons - EAN Holdings, #9 Summons 9 - Summons - Barksdale, #10 Civil Cover Sheet 10 - Civil Cover Sheet)(Thurman, Carson)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
