Echols v. Boyd
Robert Echols |
Bert Boyd |
2:2021cv02391 |
June 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Memphis Office |
Mark S Norris |
Tu M Pham |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Domestic return receipt for certified mail to TN Attorney General. (jae) |
Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE RECORD AND RESPOND TO THE PETITION. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 07/26/2021. (Norris, Mark) |
Filing 10 Case initiation fee: PAID $ 5.00, receipt number M4676049612 (csf) |
Filing 9 ORDER DENYING #1 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO PAY THE HABEAS FILING FEE. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 06/14/2021. (Norris, Mark) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Tennessee Eastern; Case Number 3:21-cv-00182. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/11/2021: #2 Judicial Cards) (csf). |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT ORDER, the Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the Western Division of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee and to CLOSE this Court's file. Signed by District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 6/11/21. (c/m)(ADA) [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 6/11/2021.] |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION in support of the following Judgment Order. Signed by District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 6/11/21. (c/m Robert Echols 123712 NORTHEAST CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX P.O. BOX 5000 MOUNTAIN CITY, TN 37683) (ADA) [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 6/11/2021.] |
Case transferred to District of Western District of Tennessee. (ADA) [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 6/11/2021.] |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary L Barker on behalf of Bert Boyd (Barker, Zachary) [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 6/11/2021.] |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (ADA) [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 6/11/2021.] |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Robert Echols. (Attachments: #1 Other Envelope)(ABF) [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 6/11/2021.] |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Echols. (ABF) [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 6/11/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Echols v. Boyd | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Robert Echols | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Bert Boyd | |
Represented By: | Zachary L. Barker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.