Hyneman v. AutoZone, Inc.
| Neal Hyneman |
| AutoZone, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv02427 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by AutoZone, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Patrick B. Johnson, #3 Exhibit NY Complaint, #4 Exhibit Bill Jacket 1935, Ch. 619, #5 Exhibit Bill Jacket 1956, Ch. 539, #6 Exhibit Bill Jacket 1966, Ch. 989)(Myatt, Christopher) |
Filing 15
[**TEXT ORDER ONLY--NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED**] Defendant moves unopposed for an extension of time through August 18, 2021, to respond to the complaint. (ECF No. 14.) For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion. Defendant shall have through August 18, 2021, to respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 7/9/2021. (kll)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (unopposed) proposed Order submitted by AutoZone, Inc.. (Myatt, Christopher) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Michael Myatt on behalf of AutoZone, Inc. (Myatt, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Neal Hyneman as to AutoZone, Inc.. (Kopel, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Alec Leslie on behalf of Neal Hyneman (Leslie, Alec) |
| Filing 10 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #9 Notice of Appearance filed by Neal Hyneman has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: the pleading has a "wet" signature and not the required electronic signature. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (agj) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Alec Leslie on behalf of Neal Hyneman (Leslie, Alec) |
| Filing 8 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #7 Notice of Appearance filed by Neal Hyneman has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: the pleading has a "wet" signature and not the required electonic signature. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (agj) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Alec Leslie on behalf of Neal Hyneman (Leslie, Alec) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to AutoZone, Inc.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AutoZone, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3639770), filed by Neal Hyneman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Kopel, Yitzchak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hyneman v. AutoZone, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Neal Hyneman | |
| Represented By: | Alec Leslie |
| Represented By: | Yitzchak Kopel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AutoZone, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Myatt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
