Millen v. Brewer's Body Shop et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Millen
Defendant: Brewer's Body Shop and Curtis E. Brewer
Case Number: 2:2021cv02480
Filed: July 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Sheryl H Lipman
Referring Judge: Tu M Pham
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2021 Filing 17 USCA Case Number 21-5790 for #16 Notice of Appeal filed by Kevin Millen. Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Kevin Scott Millen. Transcript needed: n. (btg)
August 17, 2021 Filing 16 PRO SE NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #15 Judgment by Kevin Millen. (Attachments: #1 Judgment, #2 Envelope)(btg)
August 12, 2021 Filing 15 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 8/12/21. (shl)
August 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 08/12/21. (shl)
August 10, 2021 Filing 13 PRO SE OBJECTION to #12 Report and Recommendations by Kevin Millen. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(btg)
August 5, 2021 Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Pro Se Complaint filed by Kevin Millen. Objections to R&R due by 8/19/2021. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on 8/5/2021. (pcr)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on 8/4/2021. (jrs)
July 28, 2021 Filing 10 PRO SE MOTION not to Allow Subject Matter Jurisdiction Plus Showing Losses Because of Misuse of the System by Kevin Millen. (Attachments: #1 attachment (proposed order), #2 envelope)(btg)
July 28, 2021 Filing 9 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Millen. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(btg)
July 27, 2021 Filing 8 PRO SE MOTION for Summary Judgment by Kevin Millen. (Attachments: #1 attachment (proposed order), #2 envelope)(btg)
July 27, 2021 Filing 7 PRO SE MOTION to Have this Case Moved to the Chief Judge of the Western District of Tennessee by Kevin Millen. (Attachments: #1 attachment (proposed order), #2 envelope)(btg)
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing plaintiff to file a properly completed in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the civil filing fee. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on 7/21/2021. (jrs)
July 19, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (csf)
July 19, 2021 Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, this case has been assigned to the United States magistrate judge for management of all pretrial matters, including screening of the complaint to determine whether or not summons shall be issued by the Clerk pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and Local Rule 4.1(b)(2)(csf)
July 19, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (csf)
July 19, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf)
July 19, 2021 Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Millen. (csf)
July 19, 2021 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 filed by Kevin Millen against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Statement, #2 Document from BBB, #3 Receipts, #4 Final Bill, #5 Judicial Cards)(csf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Millen v. Brewer's Body Shop et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Millen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brewer's Body Shop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curtis E. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?