Barrs v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| Kimberly Barrs |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company and H & M International Transportation, Inc. |
| Temiika Gipson |
| 2:2021cv02535 |
| August 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Thomas L Parker |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE by Kimberly Barrs Plaintiff's Notice of Service of Rule 26 Initial Disclosures (Smith, W.) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE by Kimberly Barrs Plaintiff's Notice of Service of Rule 26 Initial Disclosures (Smith, W.) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Norfolk Southern Railway Company of Initial Disclosures (Bennett, John) |
| Filing 18 SETTING LETTER - Notice of Setting: Proposed Pretrial Order due 12/29/22; Pretrial Conference set for 1/6/2023 at 9:30 AM; and the Civil Trial set for 1/17/2023 at 9:30 AM, and it is expected to last about three days. (mlk) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE by Kimberly Barrs Correspondence to Judge Parker re Telephonic Scheduling Conference (Smith, W.) |
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 10/8/2021. (Parker, Thomas)
|
| Filing 15 Minute Entry for Telephonic Scheduling Conference held before Judge Thomas L. Parker on 10/8/2021. W. Bryan Smith appeared for Plaintiff. John Bennett appeared for Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. And Albert McLean appeared for Defendant H & M International Transportation, Inc. The conference began with Plaintiff recounting the case's facts and providing the Court with an update on Plaintiff's injuries and employment status. As the parties began to discuss their proposed scheduling order, the Court expressed concern over the extended timeline and then suggested alternative deadlines. Of note, the ADR deadline is moved to January 14, 2022; the joint proposed pretrial order is due December 29, 2022; the pretrial conference is set for January 6, 2023; and the trial date is January 17, 2023, and it is expected to last about three days. (Court Reporter Catherine Phillips.) (aah) |
| Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Bennett, John) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kimberly Barrs as to H & M International Transportation, Inc.. (Smith, W.) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to H & M International Transportation, Inc.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj) |
| Entered in error. |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Summons by W. Bryan Smith on behalf of Kimberly Barrs. (Smith, W.) |
| Filing 10 SETTING LETTER - TEXT ONLY, NO IMAGE ATTACHED Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 10/8/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Thomas L. Parker. Please call 877-336-1839 to dial into the conference call. The access code is 6517215.(mlk). (Main Document 10 replaced on 9/28/2021) (mlk). Modified on 9/28/2021 (Parker, Thomas). |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation for Norfolk Southern Railway Company.. (Bennett, John) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by H & M International Transportation, Inc.. (McLean, Albert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Albert G. McLean on behalf of H & M International Transportation, Inc. (McLean, Albert) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Reifers, Stephanie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Norfolk Southern Railway Company from Circuit Court of Shelby County TN, case number CT-2815-21 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3682037), filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Bennett, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
