Davis et al v. Lee
| Melvin Davis, Andrew Sidney Phillips, Samuel Matthews and Eduardo Wells |
| William B. Lee |
| 2:2021cv02573 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF CHANGE IN SETTING: (TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY): The parties are hereby notified that the Scheduling Conference currently set for Tuesday, November 16, 2021 will be held before Judge Annie T. Christoff via Microsoft Teams Video Conference.(vup) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for More Definite Statement or, Alternatively, to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim and Dismiss or Strike Class Allegations by William B. Lee. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for a More Definite Statement or, Alternatively, to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim and Dismiss or Strike Class Allegations)(Brandon, Cody) |
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING #13 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff on 10/27/2021. (jad)
|
| Filing 14 SETTING LETTER: A Scheduling Conference has been set for Tuesday, November 16, 2021 at 1:30 P.M. via Microsoft Teams Video Conference before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. Plaintiffs shall contact the case manager via email at sandra_mcclain@tnwd.uscourts.gov by close of business on Monday, November 15, 2021 for a link to join the hearing. The proceeding will be done via Microsoft Teams video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. Please email Sandra McClain at sandra_mcclain@tnwd.uscourts.gov for any questions.(smm) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by William B. Lee. (Brandon, Cody) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Mallory Kathryn Schiller on behalf of William B. Lee (Schiller, Mallory) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert William Mitchell on behalf of William B. Lee (Mitchell, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody Nash Brandon on behalf of William B. Lee (Brandon, Cody) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eduardo Wells, Melvin Davis, Samuel Matthews, Andrew Sidney Phillips as to William B. Lee. (agj) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO MODIFY DOCKET. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 9/17/21. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE declining Agreement to Receive NEF by Melvin Davis. (btg) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to William B. Lee. The filer was given two copies of the summons and instructed to serve a copy of the complaint along with the summons to the defendant. (btg) |
| Filing 5 Case initiation fee: $ 402, receipt number M4676050051 (btg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (btg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights against William B. Lee, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 judicial cards)(btg) |
| Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, this case has been assigned to the United States magistrate judge for management of all pretrial matters. Pursuant to Local Rule 4.1(b)(1), the plaintiff shall present the Clerk with a properly completed summons for each defendant, and the Clerk shall issue the summons(es) to the plaintiff for service on the defendant(s). (csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
