Johnson v. Boyd
| O'Neal Johnson and Oneal Johnson |
| Bert Boyd |
| 2:2021cv02600 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Tu M Pham |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Certified mail return receipt re: #6 Order to Answer. (btg) |
| Filing 7 Certified return receipt: re #6 Order to Answer. (btg) |
Filing 6
ORDER Directing Respondent to File Record and Respond to the Petition. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 10/27/2021. (jrs)
|
| Filing 5 Case initiation fee: PAID $ 5.00, receipt number M4676050330 (csf) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Petitioner to File an in Forma Pauperis Affidavit and Trust Fund Account Statement or Pay the $5.00 Habeas Corpus Filing Fee. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 9/30/2021. (jrs)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary Lewis Barker on behalf of Bert Boyd (Barker, Zachary) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by O'Neal Johnson against Bert Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope, #3 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
