Mize et al v. Mehta et al
Plaintiff: Mr. Owen Mize and Christy Weaver Sumrall
Defendant: Nicket Mehta and Bhargesh P Mehta
Case Number: 2:2021cv02616
Filed: September 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Charmiane G Claxton
Referring Judge: Mark S Norris
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2022 Filing 15 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 2/10/2022. (Norris, Mark)
February 10, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Bhargesh P Mehta, Nicket Mehta (Wallace, Brie)
November 22, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Bhargesh P Mehta, Nicket Mehta (Eskins, Bradley)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 [**TEXT ORDER ONLY - NO IMAGE ATTACHED**] ORDER GRANTING #11 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT. Defendants' unopposed motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall have up to and including November 22, 2021 to file their answer to Plaintiffs' complaint. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 11/1/2021. (Norris, Mark)
November 1, 2021 Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order Extending Time)(Wallace, Brie)
October 8, 2021 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Owen Mize, Christy Weaver Sumrall as to Nicket Mehta. (Katzman, Michael)
October 8, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Owen Mize, Christy Weaver Sumrall as to Bhargesh P Mehta. (Katzman, Michael)
September 30, 2021 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Bhargesh P Mehta, Nicket Mehta. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Bargesh Mehta MD)(agj)
September 30, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Summons by Michael A. Katzman on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Katzman, Michael)
September 30, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Summons by Michael A. Katzman on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Katzman, Michael)
September 29, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj)
September 29, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj)
September 29, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj)
September 29, 2021 Filing 4 Judge Mark S. Norris and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (agj)
September 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3713031), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Katzman, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mize et al v. Mehta et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mr. Owen Mize
Represented By: Michael A. Katzman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christy Weaver Sumrall
Represented By: Michael A. Katzman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicket Mehta
Represented By: Brie Danielle Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bhargesh P Mehta
Represented By: Brie Danielle Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?