Blakes v. Marshall
Heardstine Blakes |
Dominique Marshall and State Farm Mutal Automobile Insurance Company |
Temiika Gipson |
2:2021cv02738 |
November 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Charmiane G Claxton |
Thomas L Parker |
Motor Vehicle |
23 U.S.C. ยง 134 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE by State Farm Mutal Automobile Insurance Company Consent to Removal (Carson, Dawn) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Dawn Davis Carson on behalf of State Farm Mutal Automobile Insurance Company (Carson, Dawn) |
Filing 9 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Dominique Marshall. Amended Civil Cover Sheet. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Additional Party/Attorney)(Slager, Jennifer) |
Filing 8 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Dominique Marshall. Amended Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Complaint, #2 Exhibit Amended Notice of Filing Amended Notice of Removal)(Slager, Jennifer) |
Filing 7 ATTACHMENT Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Notice of Removal, by Dominique Marshall.. (Slager, Jennifer) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
Filing 3 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Dominique Marshall has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: : Filer failed to include a civil cover sheet with the complaint. You may use the event "Attachment", linking the filing to the original pleading. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (jae) |
Filing 2 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (jae) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dominique Marshall from Circuit Court of Shelby County, TN, case number CT-3925-21 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3757016), filed by Dominique Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint and Summons, #2 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Slager, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.