United States of America v. Economic Opportunities et al
United States of America |
Albert Anding |
Economic Opportunities |
2:2021cv02780 |
December 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Charmiane G Claxton |
Sheryl H Lipman |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT reissued. (btg) |
Filing 5 WRIT of Garnishment issued. (btg) |
Filing 4 COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment filed by United States of America has been filed. For future reference, please note: Civil cover sheet has 'wet' signature of attorney; all signatures must be electronic. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. Filer is not required to resubmit document. (btg) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Administrative track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg) |
Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (btg) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment Please Issue, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fondren, Reagan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.