Tong v. Daly
| Robin W Tong |
| Geoffrey A Daly |
| Clerk and Master Virginia Gray |
| 2:2021cv02784 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Jon Phipps McCalla |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Response due by 2/18/2022. Signed by Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 2/2/2022. (mab)
|
|
Filing 11
PRO SE MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Robin W Tong. (Submitted via intake email) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Consultation)(btg).
|
|
Filing 10
Agreement to receive NEF notifications by Robin W Tong. (submitted via intake email) (btg)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Geoffrey A Daly. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(McKenney, Edward)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED. Geoffrey A Daly answer due 1/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton on 12/22/2021. (Claxton, Charmiane)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED by Geoffrey A Daly. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Certificate of Consultation)(McKenney, Edward)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj)
|
|
Filing 3
Judge Jon Phipps McCalla and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (agj)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Correction to #1 Notice of Removal, . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint)(McKenney, Edward)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Geoffrey A Daly from Tipton County Chancery Court, case number 37144 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3770935), filed by Geoffrey A Daly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Summons Return, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(McKenney, Edward)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
