DOE v. Rhodes College et al
| JANE DOE |
| Rhodes College, David Caddle, Amaka MgBoh and Richard Adams |
| 2:2021cv02811 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| John T Fowlkes |
| Tu M Pham |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
MEMORANDUM in Support re #20 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Proposed Order Submitted filed by JANE DOE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A to Pl.'s Post-Hr'g Br., #2 Affidavit Decl. Kendall Foreman, #3 Exhibit Ex. 1 to Foreman Decl., #4 Exhibit Ex. 2 to Foreman Decl.)(Brown, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 34
ORDER [TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ATTACHED] granting #32 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Post-Hearing Brief signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 2/18/2022. (Fowlkes, J.)
|
|
Filing 33
RESPONSE in Opposition re #32 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental, Post-Hearing Brief, not to Exceed Six Pages, proposed order submitted filed by Rhodes College. (Stuart, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 32
MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental, Post-Hearing Brief, not to Exceed Six Pages, proposed order submitted by JANE DOE. (Brown, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 31
Exhibit List by JANE DOE. (wrh)
|
|
Filing 30
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr.: Injunction Hearing held on 2/15/2022. Counsel for Plaintiff, Bruce S. Kramer & Jacob W. Brown; Defense counsel Lisa A. Krupicka, Sarah Elizabeth Stuart, Lani D. Lester present in court. The Court addressed de# 8 Motion to Allow Plaintiff to Proceed Under Pseudonym Jane Doe heard & Denied by the Court, written order to follow later. Plaintiff will file an Amended Complaint substituting Plaintiff's given name Kendall Foreman. Injunction Hearing heard; Plaintiff's proof/witnesses: Kendall Foreman, Exh's #1-#8. Hearing heard & taken under advisement, order to be entered.(Plaintiff: Bruce S. Kramer & Jacob W. Brown)(Defense: Lisa A. Krupicka, Sarah Elizabeth Stuart, Lani D. Lester) (Court Reporter Tina Gibson.) (wrh)
|
|
Filing 29
SETTING LETTER: [TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ATTACHED] TRO / Motion Hearing (de# 8) ADVANCED IN TIME ONLY for Tuesday, 2/15/2022 AT 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 - Memphis before Judge John T. Fowlkes Jr. (wrh)
|
|
Filing 28
Sealed Document Plaintiff's Supplemental Statement of Facts. (Brown, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 27
SEALED RESPONSE to Motion re #20 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Proposed Order Submitted Rhodes College's Sealed Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Rhodes College. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Declaration of Alicia Golston with Exhibits, #3 Declaration of David Caddle with Exhibits)(Krupicka, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 26
NOTICE of Appearance by Lani D. Lester on behalf of All Defendants (Lester, Lani)
|
|
Filing 25
SETTING LETTER: Re: #8 SEALED MOTION to Allow Plaintiff to Proceed Under Pseudonym, #20 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Proposed Order Submitted. Motion Hearing set for Tuesday, 2/15/2022 01:30 AM in Courtroom 3 - Memphis before Judge John T. Fowlkes Jr. (wrh)
|
|
Filing 24
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr.: Status Conference held on 1/31/2022. Both Parties present in court. Counsel for Plaintiff, Jake Brown standing in for Bruce S. Kramer informed the Court that Mr. Kramer is experiencing symptoms of food-poisoning; Mr. Brown stated that he is familiar with the case & can proceed if need; Mr. Brown request a continuance to allow retained counsel Mr. Kramer to be present. Defense counsel objects to the continuance. Plaintiff does look t offer testimony at the hearing; the Court will accept supplemental briefings; Supplemental Briefing deadline is Monday, 02/07/2022. Case reset to Tuesday, 02/15/2022 at 1:30 p.m. for TRO Hearing/Motion Hearing (de# 8). (Plaintiff: Bruce S. Kramer, Jake Brown stand in)(Defense: Lisa A. Krupicka, Sarah Elizabeth Stuart, Lani Lester) (Court Reporter Mark Dodson.) (wrh)
|
|
Filing 23
REPLY to Response to Motion re #19 Response to Motion, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Brown, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER [TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ATTACHED] granting #21 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Reply to Defendant's Response in Opposition signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 1/14/2022. (Fowlkes J.)
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION for Leave to File Unopposed/proposed order submitted to Judge by JANE DOE. (Kramer, Bruce)
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Proposed Order Submitted by JANE DOE. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum in Support of Motion for Injunctive Relief)(Kramer, Bruce)
|
|
Filing 19
RESPONSE to Motion re #8 SEALED MOTION to Allow Plaintiff to Proceed Under Pseudonym Response of Rhodes College in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Rhodes College. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Krupicka, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Stuart on behalf of All Defendants (Stuart, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa A. Krupicka on behalf of All Defendants (Krupicka, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 16
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JANE DOE. Richard Adams waiver sent on 12/29/2021, answer due 2/28/2022; Rhodes College waiver sent on 12/29/2021, answer due 2/28/2022. (Kramer, Bruce)
|
|
Filing 15
RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 SEALED MOTION to Allow Plaintiff to Proceed Under Pseudonym filed by Richard Adams, Rhodes College. (Krupicka, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 14
SETTING LETTER: Re: #8 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING & SEALED MOTION to Allow Plaintiff to Proceed Under Pseudonym. Motion Hearing RESET for Monday, 1/31/2022 09:30 AM in Courtroom 3 - Memphis before Judge John T. Fowlkes Jr. (wrh)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION: The TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING & SEALED MOTION hearing set Wednesday, 01/05/2022 before Judge, John T. Fowlkes, Jr. is CANCELLED. The Hearing will be reset via separate notice. (wrh)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Stuart on behalf of Richard Adams, Rhodes College (Stuart, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa A. Krupicka on behalf of Richard Adams, Rhodes College (Krupicka, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 10
SETTING LETTER: Re: #8 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING & SEALED MOTION to Allow Plaintiff to Proceed Under Pseudonym. Motion Hearing set for Wednesday, 1/5/2022 02:00 PM in Courtroom 3 - Memphis before Judge John T. Fowlkes Jr. (wrh)
|
|
Filing 9
COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #8 SEALED MOTION to Allow Plaintiff to Proceed Under Pseudonym filed by JANE DOE has been filed. For future reference, please note : Filer failed to indicate in docket text "Proposed Order Submitted" as required by local rules. If no order previously emailed to chambers, please do so upon receipt of this notice. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. Filer is not required to resubmit document. (jae)
|
|
Filing 8
SEALED MOTION to Allow Plaintiff to Proceed Under Pseudonym by JANE DOE. (Kramer, Bruce)
|
|
Filing 7
AFFIDAVIT re #1 Complaint, OF BRUCE S. KRAMER by JANE DOE. (Kramer, Bruce)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Rhodes College. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jae)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae)
|
|
Filing 2
Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3776920), filed by JANE DOE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons Rhodes College, #3 Exhibit Ex 1 Nov 15 Email from Caddle re Charges, #4 Exhibit Ex 2 Hearing and Appeals Procedure, #5 Exhibit Ex 3 Nov 26 Formal Outcome Ltr, #6 Exhibit Ex Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Request for TRO)(Kramer, Bruce)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
