Rodriguez et al v. Toyota Material Handling, Inc. et al
| Juan Castro Rodriguez and Jacqueline Ann Castro |
| Toyota Material Handling, Inc. and Toyota Material Handling of Tennessee, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv02009 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Tu M Pham |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 SETTING LETTER - TEXT ONLY, NO IMAGE ATTACHED; Scheduling Conference set for 4/1/2022 at 01:45 PM before Judge Thomas L. Parker. The proceeding will be done via Microsoft Teams video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. Please email Milton Knox at milton_knox@tnwd.uscourts.gov for any questions. (mlk) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Sam Dean Jones on behalf of Toyota Material Handling of Tennessee, Inc., Toyota Material Handling, Inc. (Jones, Sam) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Toyota Material Handling of Tennessee, Inc..(Brock, F.) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Toyota Material Handling, Inc..(Brock, F.) |
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 1/26/22. (aah)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 1/26/22. (aah)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Andrew Parker Felix, Esq. (Fee paid as part of previous filing) by Jacqueline Ann Castro. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing - MDFL, #3 Payment confirmation)(Felix, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Jacqueline Ann Castro, Juan Castro Rodriguez re #7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (proposed order submitted) (Fee paid as part of previous filing) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Nauman, Steven) |
| Filing 8 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (proposed order submitted) (Fee paid as part of previous filing) filed by Jacqueline Ann Castro, Juan Castro Rodriguez has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: there is not a certificate of good standing from the highest state court of admission. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (agj) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (proposed order submitted) (Fee paid as part of previous filing) by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing - Florida, #2 Certificate of Good Standing - M.D. Fla., #3 Receipt for Payment of Fee)(Nauman, Steven) (agj). |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Toyota Material Handling of Tennessee, Inc., Toyota Material Handling, Inc.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3782349), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Moore, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
