Loyde v. Genovese
| Ed Loyde |
| Kevin Genovese |
| 2:2022cv02049 |
| January 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION Manually File Proposed Order Submitted by Kevin Genovese. (Stone, Sarah) |
Filing 14
ORDER DENYING #11 MOTION TO MANUALLY FILE EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 3/17/2022. (shl)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by Kevin Genovese.(Stone, Sarah) |
| Filing 12 INDEX OF STATE COURT RECORD by Kevin Genovese. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Technical Record on Direct Appeal, #2 Exhibit Exhibits introduced during Trial on Direct Appeal, #3 Exhibit Jury Charge given during Trial on Direct Appeal, #4 Exhibit Volume I of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #5 Exhibit Volume II of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #6 Exhibit Volume III of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #7 Exhibit Transcript of Motion for a New Trial on Direct Appeal, #8 Exhibit Transcript of Sentencing Hearing on Direct Appeal, #9 Exhibit Notice of Appeal on Direct Appeal, #10 Exhibit Opinion of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Direct Appeal, #11 Exhibit Judgment of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Direct Appeal, #12 Exhibit Application for Permission to Appeal on Direct Appeal, #13 Exhibit Order Denying Application for Application for Permission to Appeal on Direct Appealssee Supreme Court on Direct Appeal, #14 Exhibit Technical Record on Post-Conviction Appeal, #15 Exhibit Exhibits on Post-Conviction Appeal, #16 Exhibit Transcript of Evidentiary Hearing on Post-Conviction Appeal, #17 Exhibit Transcript on Arguments on PCR Hearing on Post-Conviction Appeal, #18 Exhibit Notice of Appeal on Post-Conviction Appeal, #19 Exhibit Brief of Appellant on Post-Conviction Appeal, #20 Exhibit Brief of State on Post-Conviction Appeal, #21 Exhibit Opinion of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Post-Conviction Appeal, #22 Exhibit Judgment of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Post-Conviction Appeal, #23 Exhibit Application for Permission to Appeal on Post-Conviction Appeal, #24 Exhibit State's Response Letter on Post-Conviction Appeal, #25 Exhibit Order Denying Application for Permission to Appeal on Post-Conviction Appeal, #26 Exhibit Technical Record on Habeas Corpus Proceedings, #27 Exhibit Notice of Appeal on Habeas Corpus Proceedings, #28 Exhibit Brief of Appeal on Habeas Corpus Proceedings, #29 Exhibit Brief of State on Habeas Corpus Proceedings, #30 Exhibit Opinion of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Habeas Corpus Proceedings, #31 Exhibit Judgment from Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Habeas Corpus Proceedings)(Stone, Sarah) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Seal Document of Manually Filing Physical Exhibits (Proposed Order Submitted) by Kevin Genovese. (Stone, Sarah) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #9 First Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response by Kevin Genovese. Response is now due 3/15/2022. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 2/25/2022. (shl)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Proposed Order Submitted by Kevin Genovese. (Stone, Sarah) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND EVIDENTIARY HEARING #3 AND DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE RECORD AND TO RESPOND. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 2/1/2022. (shl)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah J. Stone on behalf of Kevin Genovese (Stone, Sarah) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Matthew Stahl on behalf of Kevin Genovese (Stahl, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 01/28/2022. (shl)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 3 Pro Se MOTION for Appointment of Counsel Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. 3006A and Evidentiary Hearing by Ed Loyde. (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ed Loyde. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Balance History Report)(csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by Ed Loyde against Kevin Genovese. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope, #3 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Loyde v. Genovese | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ed Loyde | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Kevin Genovese | |
| Represented By: | Michael Matthew Stahl |
| Represented By: | Sarah J. Stone |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
