Hubbard et al v. Ridenour et al
| Bryan Hubbard and Daisa M. Robinson |
| Darrin Jay Ridenour, Marmon Railroad Services, LLC and Railserve, Inc. |
| Temiika Gipson |
| 2:2022cv02080 |
| February 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Tu M Pham |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Railserve, Inc..(Rowlen, Brantley)
|
|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 04/04/2022. (Parker, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF SETTING: Jury Trial set for 4/24/2023 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 - Memphis before Judge Thomas L. Parker. Pretrial Conference set for 4/7/2023 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 2 - Memphis before Judge Thomas L. Parker. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 3/31/2023. (mlk)
|
|
Filing 12
Minute Entry for Scheduling Conference held before Judge Thomas L. Parker on 4/1/2022 via Microsoft Teams. James M. Gulley and Johannah F. OMalley appeared for Plaintiffs. Brantley C. Rowlen appeared for Defendants. Defendant Railserve, Inc. will answer the complaint by April 8, 2022. The Court adopted the proposed scheduling order. In addition, the Court set these trial-related deadlines: Proposed Pretrial Order due 3/31/2023; Pretrial Conference set for 4/7/2023 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 Memphis before Judge Thomas L. Parker; and Jury Trial set for 4/24/2023 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 Memphis before Judge Thomas L. Parker. (Court Reporter, Catherine Phillips)(mlk)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER Granting #9 Motion to Substitute Defendant. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 3/28/22. (jrs)
|
|
Filing 10
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting Rule 26(f) Report & Discovery Plan. (O'Malley, Johannah)
|
|
Filing 9
Joint MOTION to Substitute Party with Proposed Order by Marmon Railroad Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Proposed Order)(Rowlen, Brantley)
|
|
Filing 8
SETTING LETTER - TEXT ONLY, NO IMAGE ATTACHED; Scheduling Conference set for 4/1/2022 at 02:30 PM before Judge Thomas L. Parker. The proceeding will be done via Microsoft Teams video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. Please email Milton Knox at milton_knox@tnwd.uscourts.gov for any questions. (mlk)
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Marmon Railroad Services, LLC.(Rowlen, Brantley)
|
|
Filing 6
COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Darrin Jay Ridenour, Marmon Railroad Services, LLC has been filed. For future reference, please note Civil cover sheet has 'wet' signature of attorney; all signatures must be electronic. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. Filer is not required to resubmit document. (btg)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (btg)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (btg)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg)
|
|
Filing 2
Judge Thomas L. Parker and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (btg)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Marmon Railroad Services, LLC, Darrin Jay Ridenour from Circuit Court for Shelby County, case number CT-4821-21 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3808287), filed by Marmon Railroad Services, LLC, Darrin Jay Ridenour. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Brantley C. Rowlen, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rowlen, Brantley)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
