Arcot et al v. Sarva et al
| MD Kishore Arcot, Memphis Cardiology, PLC, Memphis Cardiology, PLC Profit Sharing Pension Plan and Memphis Cardiology PLC, Defined Benefit Plan |
| Ramesh Sarva and Ramesh Sarva CPA, PC |
| 2:2022cv02135 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| John T Fowlkes |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Ramesh Sarva, CPA, P.C. on March 21, 2022, filed by Kishore Arcot, Memphis Cardiology PLC, Defined Benefit Plan, Memphis Cardiology, PLC, Memphis Cardiology, PLC Profit Sharing Pension Plan. (Greer, Aubrey) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Ramesh Sarva on March 21, 2022, filed by Kishore Arcot, Memphis Cardiology PLC, Defined Benefit Plan, Memphis Cardiology, PLC, Memphis Cardiology, PLC Profit Sharing Pension Plan. (Greer, Aubrey) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Ramesh Sarva CPA, PC, Ramesh Sarva. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 summons)(jae) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 4 Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (jae) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Aubrey Brode Greer on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Greer, Aubrey) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Memphis Cardiology, PLC. (Montgomery, Larry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Negligence, Negligent Misrepresentation, Fraud, Breach of Contract, and Violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3824315), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Montgomery, Larry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
