Ward v. City of Memphis et al
| Tonnie Malone Ward |
| City of Memphis and City of Memphis Solid Waste Management Division |
| 2:2022cv02219 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| John T Fowlkes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by City of Memphis, City of Memphis Solid Waste Management Division. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(Gibson, Tannera) |
Filing 13
TEXT-ONLY ORDER GRANTING #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is now May 16, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff on 04/29/2022. (jad)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint proposed order submitted by All Defendants. (Stuart, Sarah) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Stuart on behalf of All Defendants (Stuart, Sarah) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Tannera George Gibson on behalf of City of Memphis (Gibson, Tannera) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tonnie Malone Ward as to City of Memphis. (agj) |
| Filing 8 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Tonnie Malone Ward as to City of Memphis Solid Waste Management Division. (agj) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to City of Memphis, City of Memphis Solid Waste Management Division. Issued summonses given to plaintiff to perfect service. (agj) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Signed Agreement to Receive Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by Tonnie Malone Ward (agj) |
| Filing 2 Case initiation fee: $ 402.00, receipt number M4676051805 (agj) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against City of Memphis, City of Memphis Solid Waste Management Division, filed by Tonnie Malone Ward. (Attachments: #1 judges cards)(agj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
