Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Brothers Industries (U.S.A), Inc.
Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. |
Brothers Industries (U.S.A), Inc. |
2:2022cv02237 |
April 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Jon Phipps McCalla |
Tu M Pham |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Mahoney Lubozynski on behalf of Brothers Industries (U.S.A), Inc. (Lubozynski, Matthew) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, UNOPPOSED Motion (Including Memorandum) to Enlarge Original Time for Response to Complaint (proposed Order submitted) by Brothers Industries (U.S.A), Inc.. (Vorder-Bruegge, Mark) |
Filing 14 SETTING LETTER: A Video Patent Scheduling Conference has been set for Thursday, 6/23/2022 at 2:00 PM before Judge Jon Phipps McCalla. The conference will be conducted by means of Zoom video conferencing. Conference invitations will be emailed at least one day prior to the hearing. (jrs) (Main Document 14 replaced on 5/23/2022 to correct case number) (jrs). |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Vorder-Bruegge, Jr on behalf of Brothers Industries (U.S.A), Inc. (Vorder-Bruegge, Mark) |
![]() |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3870886) by Flexiworld Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing NDIL, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing State of Illinois)(Grochocinski, Timothy) |
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Brother Industries on 5-2-2022, filed by Flexiworld Technologies, Inc.. (Routt, William) |
![]() |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Proposed Order Submitted) (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3859939) by Flexiworld Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Ginnings, Charles) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Brothers Industries (U.S.A), Inc.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jae) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
Filing 4 Judge Jon Phipps McCalla and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,609,402; 10,140,073; 10,481,846; 10,761,791; . (Routt, William) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Flexiworld Technologies, Inc.. (Routt, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brothers Industries (U.S.A), Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3855786), filed by Flexiworld Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Summons)(Routt, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.