Shaver v. McCarthy et al
| Thomas Shaver |
| Breaunna McCarthy, Cary J. Woods, Jacob Parker, City of Memphis and Memphis Police Dept. |
| 2:2022cv02340 |
| June 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Proposed Order Submitted filed by Breaunna McCarthy, Cary J. Woods has been filed. For future reference, please note the filing attorney has not filed a Notice of Appearance. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. Filer is not required to resubmit document. (agj) |
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 7/22/2022. (shl)
|
| Filing 14 SETTING LETTER: A Scheduling Conference has been set for Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 2:30 P.M. via Microsoft Teams Video Conference before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. The proceeding will be done via Microsoft Teams video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. Please email Sandra McClain at sandra_mcclain@tnwd.uscourts for any questions.(smm) |
| Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, proposed order submitted by City of Memphis. (Hawkins, Dennis) |
|
Filing 12
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 7/21/2022. (shl)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Proposed Order Submitted by Breaunna McCarthy, Cary J. Woods. (Godwin, Deborah) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Matthew Fletcher on behalf of City of Memphis (Fletcher, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis Patrick Hawkins on behalf of City of Memphis (Hawkins, Dennis) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to City of Memphis, Breaunna McCarthy, Memphis Police Dept., Jacob Parker, Cary J. Woods. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons, #3 summons, #4 Summons)(jae) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Summons by Christian Johnson on behalf of Thomas Shaver. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Johnson, Christian) |
| Filing 6 COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Complaint, filed by Thomas Shaver has been filed. For future reference, please note: Wet signature of attorney on document; All attorney signatures must be electronic (s/*Name*). Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. Filer is not required to resubmit document. (btg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (btg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (btg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3889659), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Johnson, Christian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
