Global Licensing, Inc. v. Deja Vu et al
Plaintiff: Global Licensing, Inc.
Defendant: Deja Vu and John Doe
Case Number: 2:2022cv02385
Filed: June 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Thomas L Parker
Referring Judge: Tu M Pham
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 7/14/22. (aah)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 7/13/22. (aah)
July 13, 2022 Filing 12 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Matthew S. Wood (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3919545) by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Eastern District of Michigan Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing State of Michigan)(Wood, Matthew)
July 12, 2022 Filing 11 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Jeffrey S Sherbow (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3918422) by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing Eastern District of Michigan, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing State of Michigan)(Sherbow, Jeffrey)
June 27, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Global Licensing, Inc. as to Deja Vu, John Doe., AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Chris Sanders on 06/24/2022, filed by Global Licensing, Inc.. (Lew, Isaac)
June 17, 2022 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Deja Vu. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj)
June 16, 2022 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Global Licensing, Inc.. (Lew, Isaac)
June 16, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Summons by Isaac Salomon Lew on behalf of Global Licensing, Inc.. (Lew, Isaac)
June 16, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae)
June 16, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae)
June 16, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae)
June 16, 2022 Filing 3 Deficiency was issued in error - Civil cover sheet does reflect electronic signature. Modified on 6/16/2022 (jae).
June 15, 2022 Filing 2 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae)
June 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief and Damages against Deja Vu, John Doe (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3898961), filed by Global Licensing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Defendants' confusingly similar advertising, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Global's advertising, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Trademark registration records for GLOBALs DEJA VU Family of Marks, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Trademark registration records for GLOBAL's additional DEJA VU marks, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Demand letter dated August 10, 2021, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - Demand letter dated January 21, 2022, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lew, Isaac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Global Licensing, Inc. v. Deja Vu et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Global Licensing, Inc.
Represented By: Isaac Salomon Lew
Represented By: Jeffrey Sherbow
Represented By: Matthew Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deja Vu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?