Benson v. Fields et al
Rickey Benson |
Kirk Fields, Deputy Jailers of Lower Level F Pod on Apr. 15, 16 + 17, 2022 + Apr. 21, 22, 23 + 24, 2022, Fleming + Gray of Grievance Dept., Doctor Ike, Deputy Jailer(s) of SCCJC Classification on Apr. 25, 2022 and Counselor Wilborn |
2:2022cv02413 |
June 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Samuel H Mays |
Tu M Pham |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 USCA Case Number 22-5723 for #15 Notice of Appeal filed by Rickey Benson. (jae) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #11 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, by Rickey Benson. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(agj) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Enjoin Crossclaim #5 to Claim #1 and to Enjoin Crossclaim #6 to Claim #4 of the Original Action Under the F.R.C.P. by Rickey Benson. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(agj) |
Filing 13 USCA Case Number 22-5713 for #12 Notice of Appeal, filed by Rickey Benson. Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Rickey Benson. Transcript needed: n. (csf) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL (and complaint of judicial misconduct) as to #11 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, by Rickey Benson. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae) |
Filing 11 ORDER dismissing complaint; dismissing #3 Motion ; dismissing #4 Motion ; dismissing #5 Motion ; dismissing #6 Motion ; dismissing #9 Motion; dismissing #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and, denying #10 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 08/04/2022. (Mays, Samuel) |
Filing 10 PRO SE MOTION for Summary Judgment by Rickey Benson. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae) |
Filing 9 PRO SE MOTION to enjoin crossclaim #2 to Claim #3 by Rickey Benson. (Attachments: #1 grievance form, #2 envelope)(jae) |
Filing 8 Letter from Rickey Benson requesting docket sheet (Attachments: #1 envelope) (jae) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
Filing 6 Pro Se MOTION(s) to Enjoin Crossclaim to Claim #3 + Crossclaim #3 to Claim #1 of the Original Action; Motion(s) of Evidence to Support Claim #4 and to Support Motion to Enjoin Crossclaim #2 to Claim #4 of the Original Action; and for FBI to Investigate Evidence Under the FRCP by Rickey Benson. (csf) |
Filing 5 Pro Se MOTION to Enjoin Crossclaim #2 to Claim #4 of the Original Action Under F.R.C.P. by Rickey Benson. (csf) |
Filing 4 Pro Se MOTION of Evidence to Support Crossclaim of Claim #1 of Crossclaim #2 of Claim #1; and for FBI to Investigate Evidence Under the F.R.C.P. by Rickey Benson. (csf) |
Filing 3 Pro Se MOTION to Enjoin Crossclaim to Claim #4 of Original Action Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures by Rickey Benson. (csf) |
Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rickey Benson. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Balance History Report)(csf) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 filed by Rickey Benson against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Grievance Forms, #2 Envelope, #3 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.