Millen v. Clark et al
| Kevin Millen |
| James Clark and Doris Clark |
| 2:2022cv02524 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Tu M Pham |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 PRO SE OBJECTION to #10 Report and Recommendations by Kevin Millen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(jae) |
| Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Pro Se Complaint filed by Kevin Millen, #9 MOTION to Show 14th Amendment is Real with this Statute 66-28-502 filed by Kevin Millen, #7 MOTION to Refute Subject Matter Jurisdiction Because of Losses and with Case 21-2734 once Ohio Court Finished the Post Office Started Once Again filed by Kevin Millen, #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Kevin Millen. Objections to R&R due by 9/2/2022. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on August 19, 2022. (cmp) |
| Filing 9 PRO SE MOTION to Show 14th Amendment is Real with this Statute 66-28-502 by Kevin Millen. (Attachments: #1 attachments)(btg) |
| Filing 8 PRO SE MOTION for Summary Judgment by Kevin Millen. (Attachments: #1 attachments)(btg) |
| Filing 7 PRO SE MOTION to Refute Subject Matter Jurisdiction Because of Losses and with Case 21-2734 once Ohio Court Finished the Post Office Started Once Again by Kevin Millen. (Attachments: #1 attachments)(btg) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on August 15, 2022. (cmp)
|
| Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, this case has been assigned to the United States magistrate judge for management of all pretrial matters, including screening of the complaint to determine whether or not summons shall be issued by the Clerk pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and Local Rule 4.1(b)(2)(csf) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (csf) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Millen. (csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 filed by Kevin Millen against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
