Thomas v. Syneos Health et al
| Wuday Thomas |
| Syneos Health and GSK |
| 2:2022cv02591 |
| September 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| John Thomas Fowlkes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 11/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton on 11/4/2022. (Claxton, Charmiane)
|
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Syneos Health. (Gerken, Samantha) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wuday Thomas as to GSK. (btg) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Syneos Health. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1-Email)(Gwinn Pabon, Heather) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Syneos Health. (Gwinn Pabon, Heather) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to GSK, Syneos Health. Filer was given two summons for each defendant for service. (Attachments: #1 summons - GSK)(jae) |
| Filing 6 Agreement to receive Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by Wuday Thomas (jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (csf) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number M4676052904 (jae) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT - 42 U.S.C. 2000e Civil Rights act of 1964 against GSK, Syneos Health, filed by Wuday Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Right to Sue, #2 Judicial Assignment cards)(jae) |
| Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, this case has been assigned to the United States magistrate judge for management of all pretrial matters. Pursuant to Local Rule 4.1(b)(1), the plaintiff shall present the Clerk with a properly completed summons for each defendant, and the Clerk shall issue the summons(es) to the plaintiff for service on the defendant(s). (csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
