Eleiwa v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Khaled Eleiwa |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| Joe W. Brown |
| 2:2022cv02592 |
| September 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Mark S Norris |
| Tu M Pham |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for Friday, 12/09/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mark S. Norris. The proceeding will be held via Microsoft Teams video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. (zsf) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Answer and Affirmative Defenses by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Polly, Erin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (btg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 2 Judge Mark S. Norris and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (btg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. from General Sessions Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, case number 2133727 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3962995), filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Copy of State Court file, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement Notice of Appearance, #4 Supplement Business Entity Disclosure Statement)(Polly, Erin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
