Renner v. Polaris Industries Inc. et al
| Amanda Renner |
| Polaris Industries Inc. and Polaris Inc. |
| Mike Forbess |
| 2:2022cv02628 |
| September 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Polaris Inc. CEO: Michael Speetzen on 08/22/22, filed by Amanda Renner. (Shaw, Amber) |
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Polaris Industries, Inc. on 08/22/22, filed by Amanda Renner. (Shaw, Amber) |
| Filing 11 SETTING LETTER: A TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference is set for 12/8/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. (der) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 10/04/2022. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc..(Presnell, Eric) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer proposed order submitted by Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc.. (Presnell, Eric) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Casey Leigh Miller on behalf of Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc. (Miller, Casey) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 3 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (agj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Russell Brandon Bundren on behalf of Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc. (Bundren, Russell) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc. from Tipton County Circuit Court, case number 7983 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3971470), filed by Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint and First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requets for Production, #2 Exhibit 2 - Return of Service for Polaris Industries Inc., #3 Exhibit 3 - Return of Service for Polaris Inc., #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Presnell, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
